Bulky Deposits and Indian Banks
Banking
Never Change
The
period was mid 1990s. (I don't remember the exact FY). Rs.730 cr. bulk deposit
(name for high cost whole sale deposit) was canvassed by a branch of a PSB
(public sector bank) in New Delhi in the last week of March from a PSU. The deposit
was for five years and the interest cost was 100 bps more than the normal rate
for a retail deposit for a similar period. Mr. X, the branch manager became a
super hero overnight, as the entire bank could achieve its top lines (business levels)
by a comfortable margin as well as that the cost impact will be felt in the
future years only.
But
there were voices of dissent at the lower
levels and in circles normally perceived as the 'negative bunch', within the bank.
Some notable remarks were
1.
A BM need to achieve the target growth for his branch only and not for the
entire bank (that is left to the head office and zonal offices)
2.
The bank may lose out on bottom line (operating/net profit) to sustain the top
line, if matching period advances at an yield higher than the cost of
acquisition is not found out.
3.
Higher interest loan comes with a compromise on quality and reduction in low
risk exposure portfolio.
4.
If the deposit is withdrawn suddenly (the concept of callable and non callable
was unknown at that time), the bank may have to borrow heavily, since the
advances financed/ investments made cannot be called back. While raising
retail deposits to that extent in a short time is ruled out, even raising bulk
deposits to match that volume will take its own time, apart from being more
costly.
The essence of the discussions were two:
A. While bringing something big and costly in the liability side, the bank should have identified/sensed the demand existing on the asset side, where the deposit can be deployed profitably. And the yield should also factor in reserve requirements for the deposit, like CRR and SLR which were offering nil/lower returns (at that time).
B. Contingent plan should have been in place to meet any demand for prematurely withdrawing the bulk deposit, so that reputation of the bank is not endangered and the resultant cost of the contingency plan to be executed is manageable.
I
did not know whether the concerns raised in the lower levels became an issue/ a
reality in the subsequent years. But I do know that the branch manager Mr. X got his promotion
to the next level shortly. Looking at future events, he was also awarded an
overseas assignment in due course.
SVB
episode of accepting bulk deposits from a particular sector (startups and the like),
then investing in long term investments, totally forsaking the likelihood of illiquidity/loss factors reminded me of the above incident.
In
my long banking career of more than 36 years, I never found a satisfying answer
to the following questions
1. Personal Career ambitions of an individual and the development of an institution are compared
to a pair of rails in which the institution should run. How to ensure that the
rails are parallel and are of the same length all the time.
2. Growing the top line, ensuring liquidity and sustaining profits – do they become
an ‘impossible trinity’ to be achieved for
small and mid-sized banks after a certain period, without going thro' reconstruction/ merger/ amalgamation?
Regards
V.
Viswanathan
26th
March 2023.
Perfect caption
ReplyDelete